- GHAJINI REVIEW
How do you count eight packs? The question plagues you when you first come at Aamir Khan in his new movie. His rippling musculature has been all the focus, through the past month, in print, in TV, in hoardings. That, and the buzz cut, with deep scars running through, showing the scalp. This is an Aamir we haven't seen before—fronting a frame filling physique, flaunting matter over mind.
If you had 15 minutes of memory, what would you cram into that terrifyingly short span? The name of your loved one, your phone number, your home? If you were a regular joe, that's exactly what you'd do, but if you are Aamir Khan in ‘Ghajini', you would bulk up your body, tattoo the name of the man you need to kill, and smear your walls with violent graffiti.
Short term memory loss means you forget, everything, within a short span of time. And the moment you get back into the zone, re-building the pieces of your life, the clock starts ticking again, for the next meltdown. It's a fascinating premise for a movie, and a few years ago, ‘Memento', made by Christopher Nolan, gave us a unique hero who suffers from short haul amnesia, while he searches for his beloved's killer.
In 2005, the Tamil ‘Ghajini', inspired by ‘Memento', catapulted the till-then-on-the-fringes lead pair of Surya and Asin into the frontlines, and turned out to be a monster hit.
Aamir Khan's first film this year, is a faithful remake of the Tamil film (with a lot of the original crew , including the director) barring a couple of twists in the climax. It has Aamir doing an out-and-out actioner after a long time (‘Sarfarosh' in 1999 was the last time he went around brandishing guns and decimating baddies). It also has him bare-chested for a lot of the running time, because he needs to display his impressively muscled frame. So is it good?
Not really, no. The thing with doing a film like this is that you have to completely get with the flow of the film, and here Aamir is split down the middle. When he's Sanjay Singhania, the billionaire boy friend of wannabe celeb Kalpana (Asin), pretending to be a broke model himself, to insinuate himself into her good books, he's just fine.
Aamir Khan has done a wonderful job. Be it the bold, energetic business magnate or the wild chaser Aamir has stolen the show.He along with Asin are among the very few positives in this movie.And he once again shows why he is known as Mr.Perfectionist.But the thing he is he shouldn’t have done this movie in the first place.This isn’t his type of film.
The sequence in which he first sees her help a bunch of disabled kids and loses his iron-clad heart to her, is a winner. So are a few others: how many impossibly wealthy men carry ‘chutta' to give the ‘pani puri wala'? He flips him his platinum card, and we crack a smile, as we are meant to.
The maximum fun is had by Asin, nicely curved and rounded, very far from unreal size zeroes, making her Hindi cinema debut. She plays pretty much the same role as she did in the original-- loud, warm, emotional, and is the best part of the movie, but even she can't liven up the pallid songs-and-dances. Third lead Jiah Khan, the medical student who studies the amnesiac and ends up first hindering then helping him, is a total loss-- she has to speak Hindi and do an item number, and both are beyond her. The villain (Pradeep Rawat) looks like he's a bit part stretched into something he can't quite handle: is he the only one they could find?
Too long, at three hours and some. Too violent. The bad guy goes around wielding a rusted iron jack and bashing peoples' heads in. And so not Aamir: ‘Ghajini' is engaging, only intermittently. Can we please have our old Aamir, the actor-star who's taught present-day mainstream Bollywood to think, back again?
- RAB NE BANA DI JODI REVIEW
Destiny plays a cruel joke on an extremely enthusiastic young girl Taani (Anushka) as she loses her fiancé and his family in a road accident on the eve of her marriage. Her father, a retired professor, on his death bed requests her to marry his old favorite student, Surinder Shahani (SRK). Taani obeys his last wish and thus begins the start of this extraordinary love story between an otherwise ordinary jodi.
The shy, somewhat geeky Surinder has already fallen for Taani since the first time he has seen her but alls his hopes crash when Taani tells him the day they arrive at his house that she won’t be able to give him any love as that’s one feeling she has lost forever with the sudden turn of events in her life. The rest of the film is about how Suri transforms himself into a very hep flirtatious dude Raj to win her love using a dancing school as a platform for his antics. He is well aided with his childhood buddy Bobby (Pathak) who brings on the physical transformation in him. But what happens is Taani who is unaware of Raj being Suri himself ends up falling in love with Raj. Suri is now again in a fix but then he finally decides to take a bold step
Rab Ne has been definitely amongst the most awaited films of 2008 and there have been great expectations riding on it especially because it is Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jaayenge maker Aditya Chopra’s comeback film after a long gap of 8 years. The script has its moments and master craftsman Adi keeps you engaged initially with some really beautifully handled moments between SRK and Anushka. But as SRK’s character’s transformation comes in the grip slowly loosens and you start feeling restless with the pace slumping down considerably. What follows is a criss-cross between some really well penned and executed scenes and some really drab moments with badly placed songs acting as speed breakers. But Adi’s terrific dialogues deserve a special applause for touching the right chords.
Shah Rukh Khan is simply superb as first the shy Suri and then the flamboyant, full of energy, Raj. Newcomer Anushka gets a really well etched character to perform and it despite being her first film, she comes across an absolute natural. Vinay Pathak is fun and provides good comic relief.
Music of the film is good but the problem is apart from a very well tuned and picturised Haule Haule number, the rest songs appear wrongly placed. The picturisation of the number featuring Kajol, Preity Zinta, Bipasha Basu, Lara Dutta and Rani is mind blowing but again it coming at a wrong juncture doesn’t really make it work.
All in all, the film has the capacity to do very well in the North and the overseas but elsewhere the film won’t be anywhere near Adi’s earlier two works in terms of business.
RESULT:
So the verdict is clear: Ghajini and Rab ne are both average movies,Rab Ne being the better one..When It comes to acting it’s a tie between Aamir and Shah Rukh. Bollywood is lucky to have them because these two can turn average fares into blockbusters as Rab Ne and Ghajini proved.
14 Responses to GHAJINI VS RAB NE BANA DI JODI ~ by Nightwing (Anish)
Dear nightwing(lolz)...ur post seems to b absolutely against ghajini (if not aamir)!!..by god..u were no less than mamata banerjee as she remains staunch in her atti towrds our chief minister!! .. well she has no other way(lol)...but atleast u shud admit dat...its not that bad either unless we compare it with memento..!!
it's a personal opinion...maybe i can never watch ghajini in an unbiased way bcoz of memento...but you have to admit that ghajini is not at all upto aamir's standard...i am not against aamir...his and asin's acting were the only good things abt the movie...in fact considering the movie..aamir gave an outstanding performance...but bollywood film-makers should seriously stop trying to use concepts which they cant implement fully well...the flashbacks in ghajini interrupted the continuity...and the last scene belongs to a mithunda or a sunny deol movie...
anish!! u said abt d flash back interrupted the continuity of ghajini.. but think atleast once that if there were no part by part flash back then what the film would have become-- 1st half: full of romance and comedy & 2nd half: full of action packed violence..and remember one thing that ghajini is not made for the viewer of memento.. it is made for the "sadasidha aam admi" of india just like surinder sahani and ghajini is a typical indian commercial movie where memento is of far different type.. u told abt aamir's activities in that 15mins.. did u expect all d things would be realistic in an indian commercial film with a tamil director?? then u should have gone for onnir or madhur vanderkar's film..
on the other hand rab ne is a equally good movie.. but the climax of rab ne is not that interesting what the viwer have expected through out the movie.. even if rab ne cannot avoid absurd things like 1)anushka cannot recognize her husband in diff get up. 2)the very ordinary surinder learnt to dance extraordinarilly in a very short time span.
above everything is that the two films are of diff tastes but one thing common between the two is that thet both are like old wine in new bottle.. on one side there is sweet love story between a ordinary husband and sweet, jolly wife.. on the other side the hero is upto revenge for the murder of his lover..
the last thing to anish is that if u ever can watch ghajini in an unbiased way then only u'll come to compare ghajini with any other bolly flick........
suchandan..u r right...this is expected from a masala bollywood film from a tamil director...but this is not what one expects from an aamir khan film...that man has set very high standards for himself...and he is the one who taught us to think...when we go to watch a shah rukh khan film we don't expect logic...we expect entertainment...but from an aamir khan film...at least i always expect some new thought...some message...even rdb was a masala movie...but there weren't any lack of logic or reasoning there...moreover there was a message..
never mind,now let me make certain things clear about how wrong and stupid ghajini is,some mistakes so obvious,but the director seems to have overlooked it-in androgade amnesia u dont forget everything,but ur ability to make new memories is lost,meaning u remember everything before the accident but after the accident u cannot remember anything for more than a few minutes(the time is not specific-15 minutes is crap and laughable)
now in memento pierce doesnt knw his wifes killer is bcoz they r wearing hoods n the other guy smashes his head in the mirror from behind,so he deosnt knw who he is!!
but in ghajini aamir clearly sees the villain ghajini at least for a good 15 min,but still cant remember him,how come???
all the reviews giving ghajini 4 stars out of 5 are very biased.....most people who say ghajini is a gr8 film are blind aamir khan fans...from no angle can the movie be called gr8.
and if we dont go by reviewers...who often have vested interests...and go by what the common man says...after 1892 votes in imdb ghajini has got 7/10....whereas rab ne got 6.9/10...so according to users both movies are almost on the same level...however many reviewers gave ghajini 4 stars or 4.5 stars out of 5 stars whereas rab ne got 2 stars to 2.5 stars out of 5 stars...how do u explain that?
yup!!there were no lack of logic in rdb but wht do u say abt lagaan or fannaa??? were they full of logic??? his directional debut tzp didnt mean that aamir had become a artfilm artist..
i also think that films related to any desease( like tzp, koi mil gaya , u me aur hum etc )
are not made from medical text books.. if it was so then i think only d docs would njoy those films..
wht did u mean with d 2nd post i couldn't get it....
Well I think...being quite neutral :P...u guys are really good judges of films, n u hav made this blog quite "heated"!!
But as I said earlier, if I be quite impartial about the two films (altho i have no reason to b so..) I think both the films have revealed a lot of facts which might not b at per with the real world..It all depends on a person how critically he points out those errors n bring them to light...and as of course, I think no bollywood films are absolutely flawless...I also believe if u really want to focus on the brighter sides of a movie...u will always get atleast a drop no matter how dry the cane is!!
So, if we keep those logical and fact figures aside which has already been discussed, I would like to say that Ghajini was quite a disappointing show in total...because it was neither a new concept, as suchandan said'old wine in new bottle', nor the screening or the editing or picturisation, watever u say, to make the audiance feel the emotion or the mental turmoil in which sanjay singhania was!! Even after u end up watching the film...u shall never b able to answer the question "What was the film all about??"...for the tamil man never emphasized any particular aspect of the film...I dont know...if amnesia was the main theme of the movie then I think...action n romance surpassed it!!..
if the movie was about the mishap and tragedy of a billionier businessman...then I think the film had been equally good if the hero had lost his speech or hearing power!!..for we never felt that he had any prob regarding his memory, every thing was ready for him ryt from the start...
if the movie was all about ghajini the villain, then it was total worthless!!..the villain was typicall tamil type...thank god, he was not wearing white lungi!!
well guys....those were few more flaws that I pointed out..and as its not a review..I hav every ryt to do so(lol)...!!!!
its for u to digest rather accept it!!!
there may be lack of aamirkhanness in ghajini.. rab ne may be better entertaining movie.. but u 2 cannot reject the bussiness fact of these films.. ghajini is the 1st indian movie to collect a collosal amount of 200 crores in india and abroad... whereas rab ne have collected only 70 crores so far as far economic times... ;-)
well business facts doesn't always say how good a film is...
I think the big box office profit is due to the aamir factor...Even i watched it initially bcoz of that!!!
i think shah rukh looks more like calaney in his films where as aamir has different looks in each of his diff films starting from raja hindustani,dil chahta hey,lagaan,fanaa,rang de basanti,mangal pandey,taare zameen par & of course ghajini
hope 2 see a new look in 3 idiots also,but see billo barber,& oso its same xcept for rnbdj
yes i know that... but as far as the above posts concern the two films both are not very good.. so i drew the bussiness factor.. at least there is one common factor that can be compared between these two films.
ghajini did this business on pure hype....and it hasnt crossed 200 yet...more around 170...and the biggest indian grosser till date is not ghajini..its gadar...according to box-officeindia.com
SRK vs Aamir (2007 and 2008)
SRK releases
FILM NAME DISTRIBUTION COST EARNINGS(INDIA)
_____________________________________________
CHAK DE INDIA 25 CRORES 64 CRORES
_______________________________________
OM SHANTI OM 50 CRORES 86 CRORES
________________________________________
RAB NE BANA DI 35 CRORES 84 CRORES(need 7 crore more)
JODI
_________________________________________
TOTAL 3 FILMS.....COST 110 CRORES AND INDIA RETURNS ARE 234 CRORES
AVERAGE GAIN PER FILM = 41 CRORES......TOTAL GAIN = 123 CRORES
____________________________________________________________
Aamir releases
FILM NAME DISTRIBUTION COST EARNINGS(INDIA)
______________________________________________
TAARE ZAMEEN 24 CRORES 62 CRORES
PAR
_____________________________________________
GHAJINI 70 CRORES 98 CRORES(NEED 34 CRORES AND MORE)
______________________________________________
TOTAL TWO FILMS..........COST 94 CRORES AND INDIA RETURNS ARE 162 CRORES
AVERAGE GAIN PER FILM = 34 CRORES.............TOTAL GAIN = 68 CRORES
As far as I'm concerned,both movies failed to live upto the hype generated by their distributors but they emerged as Superhits as a result of which the cast and the crew of either of the movies gained.... I personally thought that the best movie of the year was "A wednesday" which was underrated...
Something to say?